GeoXpr turns a project footprint, corridor or territory into decision-grade environmental intelligence. We combine Earth observation, mass species modeling and senior ecological expertise to map habitats, locate sensitivity, weigh carbon, water and soils, compare alternatives and build a traceable evidence base for assessment and lender review.
Project to national scale. One logic, from micro-siting to territorial intelligence.
Signal, models and expert ecology. Not generic overlays, and not a black box.
Maps, GIS, methods and uncertainty. Built to be reviewed, challenged and reused.
Land-cover signal
ecoMap™
Drag to compare
Spectral classes on their own do not resolve habitat typology, ecological meaning, Natural or Modified logic, or where uncertainty needs field verification.
Remote sensing is read through habitat logic, species evidence and expert review, so the map supports survey design, alternatives, impact assessment and mitigation.
GeoXpr turns heterogeneous ecological evidence into four interoperable spatial products. Each answers a different decision question, and all keep their data, method and confidence trail.
Field-grounded ecosystem and habitat classification from remote sensing, reference data and ecological interpretation, from footprints to territories.
Mass species distribution modeling across hundreds to thousands of taxa, combining occurrence data, environmental signal and conservation relevance.
A ranked spatial view of ecological sensitivity, threats, fragmentation and project exposure, built to reveal the sectors that deserve attention first.
Spatial decision support for the mitigation hierarchy: compare alternatives, quantify residual impact and screen restoration or compensation opportunities.
The same evidence architecture supports a single asset, an infrastructure corridor, a portfolio or a territorial programme.
From a generic land-cover signal to habitat interpretation, biodiversity concentration, threat-weighted concern, Critical Habitat triggers and mitigation opportunity. Fieldwork tests the uncertainties that matter, not weak spatial logic.
Replace generic land-cover with project-scale ecological units, habitat typology and confidence that can be tested in the field.
LAYER 01 / 05Uncertainty is solved by making it spatial, hierarchical and measurable from day one. Every link is preserved, referenced and open to review by your experts and your lenders.
Earth observation, multi-sensor (Sentinel-1 and 2), harmonized at project and territorial scale.
Machine learning and mass species modeling, driven by proprietary methodology and data.
Conservation-weighted judgment and qualified expert review, attributed and defensible.
A ranked, spatial, opposable record. Auditable link by link, from habitat to offset.
Routes, budgets and offsets set on evidence, not assumption. Before they lock.
Parameters stated, not hidden behind a model.
Every result traces to its inputs and version.
Expert judgment qualified and signed.
Built to survive PS6-grade scrutiny.
The cheapest point to move a route is on a screen, not in the field. Priced to the exposure it retires, an early file is the highest-leverage line in an environmental budget.
Saving = verified avoided delay + verified avoided survey, redesign and offset rework, less the GeoXpr fee. No avoidance, no saving.
Illustrative project values, not a guarantee. BPL railway: 8% worksite-footprint reduction from early mitigation. Julien et al. 2021: median mitigation-hierarchy cost EUR 399,595.
Generic overlays are thin. Field-only surveys arrive late. Black-box models cannot be defended. One approach is spatial from day one, proprietary and expert-anchored, and admissible.
| Generic GIS overlays | Field-only surveys | Black-box models | GeoXpr | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| When it acts | Late, at review | After budgets lock | Late and static | From day one |
| Defensibility | Thin, generic | Strong but narrow | Not attributable | Expert-anchored |
| Auditability | Partial | Manual | Opaque | Versioned, link by link |
| Lender-readiness | Weak | Case by case | Rejected under PS6 | PS6-grade by design |
| Breadth | Single layer | Species-focused | Narrow target | Whole environmental surface |
Proprietary methodology and data. Attributed expertise. Day-one spatial. Admissible. Difficult to replicate, by design.
A sample of engagements across sectors and scales. Client and location details withheld under confidentiality.
Alternatives screened on ranked sensitivity, field effort focused on the sectors that mattered, and a Critical Habitat question answered before alignment freeze.
Comparable habitat and sensitivity intelligence across sites, so due diligence, capex attention and monitoring went where exposure was highest.
Habitat baseline and mass species modeling to a lender standard, with an auditable evidence trail built for IFC PS6 review from day one.
Send a footprint, a route or a boundary. We will build the evidence chain against it, and show you what a defensible baseline looks like.
